USS SANTA MARIA*****SHIP OF TRUTH

** Armchair Admiral Commanding **

THE ART OF PROGRESS IS
TO PRESERVE ORDER AMID CHANGE,
AND TO PRESERVE CHANGE AMID ORDER.
***Alfred North Whitehead***


We've set our sails,
looking for a new bridge, leading to a better world.
The one that Bill and Hillary Clinton built,
taking us into the twenty-first century,
is at least a million miles short of our destination.

Billy Jeff Clinton's Used Cars:

Those screw-driver marks around the odometer?
Well, we was fixing it. It was broke.

That sawdust around the transmission? We're pretty sure
the manufacturer suggested either sawdust or transmission fluid.

The frame? Well, it was already straight.
We just sent it in to make it even straighter.
Nothing too good for our customers.

Rollover? Could you all define "rollover" for me?

And hey young lady.
I'm sure we could work out
a "special" payment plan
if, you know,
you don't have the
money for the down payment.

http://www.spleenville.com/journal/archives/003743.php#comments


U.S.S. SANTA MARIA, SHIP OF TRUTH, is commanded by the Armchair Admiral. It has three missions. They are:

1. Illustrate obvious shortcomings, and the ultimate, certain and absolute failure of SOCIALISM, as a viable form of government.

2. To tweak the noses of those who control the content of the Santa Maria Times. The Times practices selective censorship and it presents an unfair and unbalanced view of local, state and federal politics and governmental affairs. For the most part, it promotes a "GROUP THINK" mentality, and it undermines the ideals of individual freedom, rights, both property and personal, and it minimizes the importance of personal responsibility. I believe the Santa Maria Times, by dividing people, undermines our REPUBLICAN form of government.

3. Our third mission then, is to publish material that provides counter-arguments, that is, more conservative views on the items of propaganda published in the Santa Maria Times.

On our voyage we will find and report the unvarnished truth. That will remain true until the SOCIALISTS take complete control of our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor, and individuals are reduced to the status of puppets, bouncing up and down on marionette strings, manipulated by unelected bureaucrats, who serve as puppetmasters for a

SOCIALIST GESTAPPO.

WELCOME ABOARD.
If you would like to express an opinion,
click on the Admiral's picture to send him an e-mail message:

The Admiral
reflecting back on the days when
the US Navy was comprised of wooden ships and iron men.

Armchair Admiral issues orders:


Now hear this. Now hear this. This is your Armchair Admiral speaking.

We're setting sail, in uncharted waters, leading to ports unknown,
all around the globe, in search of a cargo of truth.

We'll bring it aboard wherever we find it, then we'll take it home to our people.

Now, Hoist all boats. Cast off all lines. Set course true north. And,


"DAMN THE TORPEDOES, FULL SPEED AHEAD."



WHERE ELSE BUT FRANCE?

"Dig up your garbage, it's desecrating our ground" on the left, and "Death to Yankees" on the right, and "Rosbeefs go home, Saddam will overcome, and will make your blood run" in the middle.

When the Admiral got wind of this desecration he considered lobbing a couple of cruise missiles in the direction of the Eiffel Tower. After reconsidering, he decided that with a "real" Commander in Chief like President Bush in charge it would probably be O.K. to leave it in the hands of the politicians for the time being. A different decision might have been made if Bill Clinton was still President.

WHEN THE GOOD SHIP USS SANTA MARIA GOT UNDERWAY, THE ARMCHAIR ADMIRAL SET OUT THREE SPECIFIC MISSION OBJECTIVES. THE SECOND WAS TO PUBLICIZE THE FACT THAT THE SANTA MARIA TIMES PRACTICED CENSORSHIP OF POLITICAL OPINIONS. THE ADMIRAL NOW REPORTS, OBJECTIVE TWO HAS BEEN ACCCOMPLISHED. THE SANTA MARIA TIMES NO LONGER PRACTICES CENSORSHIP. THE TIMES IS TO BE COMMENDED FOR EXECUTING A MUCH NEEDED COURSE CORRECTION, THEREBY AVOIDING SOME ROCKY SHOALS AND SANDBARS JUST OFF GUADALUPE BEACH.


Friday, April 16, 2004


Mrs. du Toit

One of the things I don't think I've ever written about is that there is disagreement in my family over the War on Terrorism generically, and the War in Iraq, specifically.

You might have guessed that the other members of my family have always been opinionated. Since we no longer live close, we discuss things in Round Robin type e-mails. We disagree, often, over trivial issues and the e-mails can get quite heated. That's normal and expected. We might have disagreed over tax increases, how to deal with crime, etc., but those ARE trivial. We all realized they were trivial and the heat of the argument never got nasty—just HOT—and being a family used to that sort of thing, it was never any more than a hot debate.

When the degree of divide over the WOT became apparent, however, it was no longer possible to reconcile those differences with one of my sisters. My response to this? I disowned her. There were no words. There was no dramatic discussion with big arms and tears. I simply stopped speaking to her. She can live her life with her friends and I'll live mine, but our paths will never again cross--ever.

I mention this because I want to make clear, in case it wasn't painfully obvious before, that there is war on. Sides must be chosen. I don't make allowances for traitors (or slip sliders), even within my own family.

We can discuss and disagree over the wisdom of a 2% hike or decrease in sales tax forever, but, when the primary directive, the security of the country and the Free World is at stake, there is no compromise. Lines in the sand and all that.

What should also be clear, but probably not so obvious, is that it is not personal. It's war. 

THANK YOU MRS. DU TOIT FOR EXPRESSING THAT VIEWPOINT. YOUR MESSAGE WAS RECEIVED AND UNDERSTOOD BY MANY WHO WERE SEVERELY STUNG BY THE ISLAMOFASCISTS COWARDLY SNEAK ATTACK ON OUR COUNTRY ON 9-11-01.

"The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it will never forget what they did here."

That's what I think. What say you? Please comment.


Tuesday, April 13, 2004


To The Editor:

"SCATHING ATTACK ON THE UNITED NATIONS BY THE SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE."

What's that all about? "It's all about the oil," and money. Over the next several months sordid details about Saddam Hussein skimming off hundreds of millions, perhaps billions of dollars from the United Nations managed Food For Oil Program in Iraq will come to light. Based on what is known, Saddam, acting much in the style of a Mafia Godfather, bribed and corrupted dozens, perhaps hundreds or even thousands of individuals around the world.

While hate spouting Leftists make gratuitous calls for the United Nations to replace the United.States as the provisional authority in Iraq primarily to discredit President Bush, It comes to light that France, Russia, and probably to some lesser extent Germany, colluded with Saddam to scatter stolen baby milk money around the world as an insurance policy for the protection of his evil regime.

If serious people with sufficient clout to force an independent investigation of all the facts of this grotesque affair prevail, some of the most vile corruption and unparalleled greed in recent history will be uncovered. Evidence will almost surely prove that France, Russia and Germany would never have agreed to the removal of Saddam from power. So, President Bush faced them down. Blood money is a powerful motivator. So are courage and leadership.

Carthel Williams

That's what I think. What say you? Please comment.

[Powered by Blogger]

Home
Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com